Taking Cues from the Byzantines: How One Mennonite Congregation Celebrated the Mystery of Christmas

This past year we chose to do something different at Wooster Mennonite Church for our Christmas Eve service. Typically, we have scripture readings, traditional hymns, and dramatic readings, representing the various, important characters of the Christmas story. Many of these elements were present in our service this year. The different elements however came from the texts we selected for the dramatic readings. Instead of contemporary interpretations of Mary, Joseph, the shepherds, and the wise men we examined the ancient Christmas poems and hymns from the Byzantine Christian tradition. Many of these texts can be found in the book Byzantine Daily Worship. The interesting aspect of using these texts is their exalted language and sensitivity to mystery.

While many contemporary renderings of the Christmas story communicate the basic truths of the gospel message in an accessible way the ancient poems and hymns do so with a certain profound sense of awe and wonder. Sometimes contemporary nativity plays and skits seem to draw excessive attention to the audience and modern culture whereas their ancient counterparts seem fully focused on the centrality of Christ and the incarnation. This Christ-centeredness can be seen in the following selection of Byzantine hymnody, which imaginatively represents the thoughts of Mary: “The One Whom the universe cannot contain, how was He contained within my womb? He Who is in the Father’s bosom, how can He be carried in my arms?” Mary’s words represent the human longing for understanding of God’s mysterious gift in Christ, who is fully human and fully divine.

The worshipful reflections of the wise men is another of my favorite examples of Byzantine Christmas hymnody: “By means of a star, heaven has called and led us wise men, the first-fruits of the gentiles, to this little Child lying in a manger. Astounded, we beheld, not scepters and thrones, but extreme poverty. What indeed is lower than a cave? What is humbler than swaddling clothes? Yet the splendor of God shines forth in them resplendently.” In this passage we are confronted by the counterintuitive nature of the gospel: in human weakness God’s strength shines through. Though the baby Jesus seems poor and weak from His outward appearance, the glory and power of who He truly is cannot be hidden or overcome.

As I listened to these readings during our Christmas Eve service I enjoyed the feelings that they evoked in me. I felt that they were helpful in reflecting on the true meaning of Christmas. One challenging aspect about using them though was integrating their distinct language and rhythm into the broader service. It seems that if we were to use similar materials in the future we would have to think more intentionally about where to position them in the order of the service. They fit naturally into a liturgical context (they are Byzantine hymns after all coming from the liturgy of the Eastern Orthodox churches). A less liturgical church like our own may have to think of ways to adapt the texts or present them alongside some additional material to enable their true beauty to communicate most effectively to the people. I am happy to say though that we were able to draw on the rich Christmas traditions of another Christian community just like many of the traditional hymns that we sing are written by composers from various church backgrounds.

Exploring Protestant Traditions

Recently, I came upon the book Exploring Protestant Traditions by W. David Buschart. After reading a description of the work and glancing at the table of contents I knew it would likely be a worthwhile purchase. After spending some time with this text I am thoroughly convinced that it has been worth it. Buschart has an impressive fluency with the theological languages and beliefs of eight major Protestant traditions (Lutheran, Anabaptist, Reformed, Anglican, Baptist, Wesleyan, Dispensational, and Pentecostal). What’s more, his extensive knowledge is tempered with a gracious openness and affirming posture toward each of these streams of Protestantism.

After picking up Exploring Protestant Traditions I have not thought the same way about inter-Christian relations and ecumenism. Buschart imparts two key lessons (among many others) to his reader: first, each Christian tradition has an “internal coherence” (i.e., “an existential or phenomenological coherence” (p. 24) and second, “many other Christians pursue life in Christ” through these “theological and ecclesiastical traditions” (p. 27). This dual lesson goes a long way toward appreciating the value of the current diversity within global Christianity. It must be stated that Buschart never tries to minimize or hide differences between the traditions, but rather highlights the positive contributions that each can make to the broader body of Christ. This belief is reflected in the subtitle of the book: An Invitation to Theological Hospitality.

For Buschart, the basis of Christian hospitality between churches and traditions is the hospitality of God toward us in Christ. God’s gift of new life to Christians and loving action in creating one kingdom family inspires Christian hospitality. In light of this Christians are to have a “both/and” approach to unity and diversity within Christianity (p. 257). According to the author, it is “possible for someone to both stand within a tradition and stand with other Christians outside that tradition” (p. 258). This is what it means to be hospitable. The eschatological dimension of our faith directs our attention to the future fulfillment of perfect unity and diversity in the kingdom (p. 261). As we wait for this glorious hope it is legitimate to practice hospitality with healthy “differentiation” (i.e., “proper boundaries”) as long as it does not lead to “sinful exclusion” (p. 265). The final goal of Christian hospitality is honoring Jesus’ prayer in John 17:22-23 “that all may be one…so that the world may know [and believe in Jesus]” (pp. 272-275).

One might ask why Buschart limited his study to the Protestant world, leaving out information related to Catholicism and Eastern Orthodoxy. To my knowledge this question is never addressed directly in the book, however titles of other works that provide such information are suggested in one of the footnotes. Two worth mentioning are: The Orthodox Way by Kallistos Ware and Expressions of the Catholic Faith by Kevin Johnson. They serve as good compliments to Exploring Protestant Traditions; particularly, for professors or teachers offering classes on Christianity or for self-directed study.

How Christians Refer to Each Other Matters

Recently, the Wooster City Chamber of Congress sponsored a religions roundtable as part of their yearlong leadership Wooster program. This event invited participants from seven religious traditions (Jewish, Muslim, Catholic, Mennonite, Nazarene, Mormon, and Unitarian Universalist) to present their faiths to leaders from local businesses. Each presentation lasted twenty minutes, providing an overview of the history, beliefs, practices, and local expressions of these religious traditions.

I was able to attend this roundtable as a presenter for the Mennonite tradition. It was an incredible experience as I was able to learn from and interact with a wide range of leaders in the community. They had many questions and insights about the Mennonites. I tried my best to answer and respond to them (not being raised as a Mennonite did not help in this regard).

Looking back on the whole experience, which lasted about four hours, I am struck by two details: first, the incredible respect shown by the participants for their neighbors of different faiths and second, the use of the term “religion” by many for describing the various Christian and non-Christian traditions. Most of the participants in the program were affiliated with a Christian church. When referring to Islam or Judaism they often spoke of them as other “religions.” This made perfect sense to me. What caught me off guard was when they described the different Christian traditions (Protestant, Catholic, and Orthodox) as different religions. From my perspective, they are different expressions of the same religion: Christianity. I made this point several times during my presentations. It resonated more with some participants more than others.

During the presentations, many of the participants seemed to appreciate the language of traditions, expressions, forms, and streams of Christianity. Some however preferred to use the term “religion” for the different Christian groups and one person even mentioned the term “sect.” As I mentioned earlier, all terms were used with the utmost respect so there was no sense that anyone was berating the various churches. Aside from the enjoyment of dialoguing with so many interesting people, I left the roundtable event with one question in mind: how can I effectively share with others a vision for the common foundations that many churches share in the scriptures and the ancient creeds without sounding dismissive of their significant differences?

Whatever the answer may be to this question I do believe that the way Christians refer to each other matters. Paul reminds us that we need to make “every effort to maintain the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace” because “there is one body and one Spirit…one hope…one Lord, one faith, one baptism, one God and Father of all, who is above all and through all and in all” (Ephesians 4:3-6). Perhaps, if we can recognize these powerful foundations of our faith in Christians of other traditions we will begin to think of them as part of our broader family and as part of one Christian religion.

Many Traditions, Many Gifts, One Spirit, One Lord

I am very interested in the concept of gifting for exploring the Holy Spirit's work in drawing all Christians (and their larger ecclesial traditions) back together into one body without loosing a sense of each one's unique vocation. If one can speak of the various divided churches and communities as possessing unique gifts, perhaps, by God’s providential wisdom, these have been given to encourage greater cooperation, love, and, ultimately, unity among God's people in His saving plan for humanity. This all occurs in the context of repudiating past sins, errors, and divisions.

Let me offer some examples of what I am talking about when I speak of gifting in terms of broader ecclesial communities. These are generalizations and I realize that one could see examples of all three of these in each of the traditions respectively, but I think there is something to the way in which they are emphasized in each tradition according to its own heritage and vocation. They are: Spirit-centered experience (a gift emphasized in Pentecostalism), Word-centered proclamation (a gift emphasized in Protestantism), and Community-centered, apostolic oversight and practice (a gift emphasized in Catholicism and Orthodoxy).

This could be parsed out in a variety of ways. In spiritual discernment one could speak of pneumatological elements of discernment including the gift of discernment (emphasized in Pentecostalism), dynamic understanding of circumstances in light of Scripture (emphasized in Protestantism), and inspired guidance for weighing events in light of Tradition (emphasized in Catholicism and Orthodoxy). Related Christological elements of discernment could include Christ’s character experienced through the spiritual fruits (Pentecostalism), Christ’s teachings recorded in Scripture (Protestantism), and Christ’s authority incarnationally and visibly preserved by the Church and the passing on of Sacred Tradition (Catholicism and Orthodoxy).

In terms of soteriology one could speak of the Pentecostal emphasis on manifestations of the Spirit in transforming and healing human beings (the language of "baptism in the Spirit"), the Protestant emphasis on union with Christ in faith as freeing individuals (the language of "imputation of righteousness"), and the Catholic and Orthodox emphasis on sacramental cleansing and healing (the language of "infused grace" and "participating in the divine nature" respectively).

In terms of ecclesiology one could speak of the charismatically sustained service of the local body and spiritual unity of all Christians (Pentecostalism), the Word-centered confessional unity of the churches (Protestantism), and the visible unity and apostolic succession of the Catholic and Orthodox traditions.

I think John Paul II captures the hopefulness necessary for and inherent in such a vision of gifting and Christian reunion: “One...is capable of bringing forth good even from evil, from human weakness. Could it be that these divisions have also been a path continually leading the Church to discover the untold wealth contained in Christ’s Gospel and in the redemption accomplished by Christ? Perhaps all this wealth would not have come to light otherwise...More generally, we can affirm that for human knowledge and human action a certain dialectic is present. Didn't the Holy Spirit, in His divine 'condescendence,' take this into consideration? It is necessary for humanity to achieve unity through plurality, to learn to come together in the one Church, even while presenting a plurality of ways of thinking and acting, of cultures and civilizations. Wouldn't such a way of looking at things be, in a certain sense, more consistent with the wisdom of God, with His goodness and providence?” (Crossing the Threshold of Hope, 153).

In addition, Miroslav Volf's approach to gifting is quite helpful. He suggests that Christians in community reflect the perichoretic relations of the Triune God as they serve one another in love with their unique gifts, affirming one another without subordination or homogenization (see: After Our Likeness: The Church as the Image of the Trinity). Perhaps this image could be applied to larger Christian traditions as they serve one another in Christ and cooperate at the regional and global level.

One final point needs to be mentioned. Each ecclesial tradition needs to examine what it identifies as its own gifting, realizing that all of the practices and teachings (often thought of as a unique heritage) within a given tradition may not be inspired by the Holy Spirit. Yves Congar attributes some of these developments to social, political, and historical factors that do not always contribute positively to the cause of Christian unity and should not necessarily be retained (I Believe in the Holy Spirit, 2:203-204). A reunited Church could affirm the particular gifts of many Christian traditions, but invite such a critical self-examination in faithfulness to the vision of unity in Jesus' prayer in John 17. If the various Christian traditions can be assured that their own gifts and sense of vocation will contribute to the direction and well-being of a reunited Church then perhaps greater openness to the idea might ensue.